Browse thread
Shallow copy of a record
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2005-01-22 (20:08) |
From: | Chris King <colanderman@g...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Shallow copy of a record |
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 18:55:40 +0100, Michal Moskal <michal.moskal@gmail.com> wrote: > No, consider: > > let copy foo = {foo with a = b} > > and now, if there were no assign: > > let copy foo = {foo} > > what should be the type of copy? Ah okay, I didn't think about that. But I suppose in cases like that, the type could be forced, as in "let copy foo = { (foo:bar) }".