Browse thread
Mutex and posix
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2005-01-17 (12:33) |
From: | Luca Pascali <luca@b...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Mutex and posix |
Alex Baretta wrote: > Luca Pascali wrote: > >> Just a little question, my curiosity about the thread module. >> >> I found in Posix (this is from 'info libc' page on section Mutexes) >> these three functions >> >> Function: int pthread_mutex_lock (pthread_mutex_t *mutex)) >> Function: int pthread_mutex_trylock (pthread_mutex_t *MUTEX) >> Function: int pthread_mutex_timedlock (pthread_mutex_t *MUTEX, const >> struct timespec *ABSTIME) > > > You can probably simulate the third one fairly well by resorting to > Unix.select as a timer, but why in the world would you want to lock > for a while and then forget about it? > > Besides --- given Machiavelli works in an asynchronous, event-modeled > world --- why would want to use synchronous primitives such as timedlock? > > Alex > > It's not about Machiavelli. It was just a curiosity (We spoken personally a few months ago). I staied with the doubt about the missing of this function and I thought that asking to the list was the best thing to do for having an answer. And it was. Luca -- ********************************************************************* Luca Pascali luca@barettadeit.com asxcaml-guru@barettadeit.com http://www.barettadeit.com/ Baretta DE&IT A division of Baretta SRL tel. 02 370 111 55 fax. 02 370 111 54 Our technology: http://www.asxcaml.org/ http://www.freerp.org/