Browse thread
yacc style
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2005-01-28 (00:41) |
From: | Chris King <colanderman@g...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] yacc style |
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:39:56 +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo <ocaml-erikd@mega-nerd.com> wrote: > Yes, normally the parser generates a parse tree which is then > passed to the semantic analyser for semantic checking. Okay, sounds good -- thanks! On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 22:52:43 +0000, Jon Harrop <jon@jdh30.plus.com> wrote: > May I ask what makes it difficult to use a functional style in your case? > Perhaps it isn't as difficult as you think... It's for performance reasons, mostly: the structure consists of a hash table (to store user symbol definitions) and an array (for the actual data). It's easy enough to get the data in the form of a parse tree and massage it into these structures afterwards; I was just wondering if there was a more direct way.