Browse thread
Strange observation on polymorphic '<'
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Olivier Andrieu <andrieu@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Missing a function |
> Radu Grigore [Sat, 29 Jan 2005]:
> On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 15:13:44 +0100, Frédéric Gava
> <frederic.gava@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
>
> > > let cardinal e = fold (fun _ _ x -> succ x) e 0;;
> > [...] Map are also implemented as balanced
> > tree (like sets) and therefore, it is easy to add a function of "cardinal".
>
> I agree it's strange not to have "cardinal" in Map.Make. The
> implementations of Set and Map are likely to be very similar anyway.
Another option is to build on top of the stdlib Map functor another
functor that keeps track of the cardinal of a map :
module CMap = functor (Ord : Map.OrderedType) ->
(struct
module M = Map.Make (Ord)
type key = M.key
type 'a t = int * 'a M.t
let cardinal = fst
let empty = 0, M.empty
let add k v (n, m) = (n + 1, M.add k v m)
let find k (_, m) = M.find k m
....
: sig
include Map.S
val cardinal : 'a t -> int
end)
--
Olivier