[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Erik de Castro Lopo <ocaml-erikd@m...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] yacc style |
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 15:17:13 -0500 Chris King <colanderman@gmail.com> wrote: > Is it considered better style to > instead have the parser return a parse tree, and then use that to > generate the imperative structure, Yes, normally the parser generates a parse tree which is then passed to the semantic analyser for semantic checking. Erik-- +-----------------------------------------------------------+ Erik de Castro Lopo nospam@mega-nerd.com (Yes it's valid) +-----------------------------------------------------------+ "... a discussion of C++'s strengths and flaws always sounds like an argument about whether one should face north or east when one is sacrificing one's goat to the rain god." -- Thant Tessman