Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Ocaml license - why not GPL?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Jacques Garrigue <garrigue@m...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Ocaml license - why not GPL?
From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>

> > The QPL is an official open-source license.
> 
> Well, it seems that this same fact is highly disputed, and trolltech did in
> fact dual licence Qt under the GPL too. The current ocaml licence was modified
> from plain QPL though recently, after 2-4 week of intense flamewar on
> debian-legal, and there are some clause yet in it which where subject to
> discussion.

Well, I don't know who disputed this, at least it is an OSI recognized
open-source license, which I believe to be the definition of
"officially open-source".

To the best of my knowledge, Trolltech decided to release a GPL'ed
version of Qt because the QPL is not compatible with the GPL, which is
no surprise at all: by definition the GPL is only compatible with
itself, or strictly weaker licenses, like BSD or LGPL.

This is less of a problem with ocaml, because the part covered by the
QPL is the compiler, not the library, so this should only concern
persons hacking the compiler itself.

Jacques Garrigue