Jon Harrop wrote:

> [...]
>
>I believe that the name of a polymorphic variant, as a string, is not in the 
>marshalled string. Instead, the name is in the type, which is not conveyed by 
>marshalling. I think the marshalled string will actually contain a fixed-size 
>hash of the string name.
>
>In theory, two polymorphic variant names which produce the same hash should be 
>indistinguishable at run-time. Producing them will be tricky though.
>
>A consequence of this is the fixed-size (1-word) of a marshalled polymorphic 
>variant:
>
># Marshal.to_string `dkdfbgkadjfbgljbfgljkabhvlkjblvbalvbvlabalbvaslbk [];;
>- : string =
>"\132\149¦¾\000\000\000\005\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\002í\014âí"
># Marshal.to_string `abcd [];;
>- : string =
>"\132\149¦¾\000\000\000\005\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\002ÀheÂ"
>
>Cheers,
>Jon.
>
>  
>
Ok, anyway I already dropped the way of analisis of marshalled string, 
because I don't even know if it is always done in the same way across 
platforms and ocaml versions.

Tkanks.

I will probably insert in a tuple a string with the name of the construtor.

Luca




-- 
*********************************************************************
Luca Pascali
luca@barettadeit.com
asxcaml-guru@barettadeit.com

http://www.barettadeit.com/
Baretta DE&IT
A division of Baretta SRL

tel. 02 370 111 55
fax. 02 370 111 54

Our technology:
http://www.asxcaml.org/
http://www.freerp.org/