Browse thread
Ocaml sums the harmonic series -- four ways, four benchmarks: floating point performance
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2005-01-15 (15:49) |
From: | Michal Moskal <michal.moskal@g...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Ocaml sums the harmonic series -- four ways, four benchmarks: floating point performance |
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:55:19 +0100, Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr> wrote: > As others have mentioned, this strongly depends on the processor > instruction set and even on the processor model. My own benchmarks > (with your Caml code) give the following results: > > PPC G4 (Cube) 1 < 2 < 3 < 4 < 5 speed ratio = 1.5 > Xeon 2.8 3 < 4 < 1 = 2 < 5 speed ratio = 1.02 > Pentium 4 2.0 3 < 1 < 2 < 4 < 5 speed ratio = 1.2 > Athlon XP 1.4 4 < 5 < 3 < 1 < 2 speed ratio = 2.2 I tested it on Athlon 64 3000+ using both 32bit and 64bit compilers, the results: 32bit: 4 = 5 < 3 < 1 = 2, speed ratio 2.2 64bit: 3 < 1 = 2 = 4 < 5, speed ratio 1.15 Difference between 64 and 32 bit version (best cases) is 1.30 (64 is faster). All tests were performed using ocaml 3.07. > The Athlon figures are *very* surprising. It could be the case that > this benchmark falls into a quirk of that (otherwise excellent :-) > processor. So I guess in 32 bit mode it remains the same on newer athlons. -- : Michal Moskal :: http://nemerle.org/~malekith/ :: GCS !tv h e>+++ b++ : No, I will *not* fix your computer............ :: UL++++$ C++ E--- a?