Browse thread
cyclic types
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2005-01-29 (23:47) |
From: | Damien Doligez <damien.doligez@i...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] cyclic types |
On Jan 29, 2005, at 18:33, Radu Grigore wrote: > For now I have setteled for > type forest = Forest of forest StringMap.t > > Can you give an example of why rectypes by default is dangerous? IIRC, rectypes are off by default because they trade a small increment in expressive power for a large degradation of the intelligibility of type-checking error messages. I don't think they are dangerous in the sense of breaking the type system. -- Damien