Browse thread
[Benchmark] NBody
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Robert Roessler <roessler@r...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] [Benchmark] NBody |
sejourne_kevin wrote: > Martin Jambon a écrit : > >> On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Christophe TROESTLER wrote: >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> For fun I have implemented an nbody simulation following >>> http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/benchmark.php?test=nbody&lang=all&sort=cpu >>> >>> (code is attached). I've compiled it with >>> >>> ocamlopt -o nbody.com -inline 3 -unsafe -ccopt -O2 nbody.ml >> >> >> >> -inline 100 gives better results for me (around -25%) >> This should be enough to beat Java :-p if you get the same improvement on >> your side. > > Same for me, but "-ccopt -O2" don't change anything. That might be because the C compiler doesn't really have anything to do with ocamlopt... :) The C *compiler* only comes into play if you have any .c files on the ocamlopt command line - the C *linker* will be used for all linking. Robert Roessler robertr@rftp.com http://www.rftp.com