Browse thread
Memory allocation nano-benchmark.
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | skaller <skaller@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Memory allocation nano-benchmark. |
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 03:50, Marwan Burelle wrote: > On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:59:53 -0500, John Prevost <j.prevost@gmail.com> wrote: > > In a program that allocates one very large chunk of memory, > It also depends on malloc, on Linux it sometimes works > "optimisticaly", that is, it won't realy allocate memory unless you > use it This behaviour is not allowed by the ISO C Standard. This case was actually discussed by WG14. -- John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net voice: 061-2-9660-0850, snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net