Browse thread
Memory allocation nano-benchmark.
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Oliver Bandel <oliver@f...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Memory allocation nano-benchmark. |
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 12:04:20PM +1100, skaller wrote: > On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 03:50, Marwan Burelle wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:59:53 -0500, John Prevost <j.prevost@gmail.com> wrote: > > > In a program that allocates one very large chunk of memory, > > > It also depends on malloc, on Linux it sometimes works > > "optimisticaly", that is, it won't realy allocate memory unless you > > use it You can call calloc() instead of malloc, so you automatically use the memory. Would be interesting to have a bench on this... > > This behaviour is not allowed by the ISO C Standard. Yes, that's true. > This case was actually discussed by WG14. What is the WG14? Ciao, Oliver