Browse thread
Estimating the size of the ocaml community
-
Yaron Minsky
-
Christopher A. Watford
-
Frédéric_Gava
-
skaller
-
Erik de Castro Lopo
- Olivier_Pérès
-
Thomas Fischbacher
-
Frédéric_Gava
-
Thomas Fischbacher
- Paul Snively
- josh
- Richard Jones
-
Jon Harrop
-
Michael Walter
-
Jon Harrop
- Damien Doligez
- Thomas Fischbacher
- Michael Walter
-
Radu Grigore
- Gerd Stolpmann
- Jon
-
Jon Harrop
- Thomas Fischbacher
- Richard Jones
-
Michael Walter
- Ville-Pertti Keinonen
- Oliver Bandel
- Basile STARYNKEVITCH
-
Thomas Fischbacher
- ronniec95@l...
- skaller
- chris.danx
-
Frédéric_Gava
-
Erik de Castro Lopo
- sejourne_kevin
- Stefano Zacchiroli
-
skaller
-
Frédéric_Gava
- Kenneth Knowles
- Michael Jeffrey Tucker
- Richard Jones
- Nicolas Cannasse
- Evan Martin
- Eric Stokes
- chris.danx
- Sylvain LE GALL
- sejourne_kevin
- Sven Luther
- Johann Spies
-
Christopher A. Watford
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2005-02-04 (17:27) |
From: | Damien Doligez <damien.doligez@i...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Estimating the size of the ocaml community |
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 11:39:50PM +0000, Richard Jones wrote: >> Got to agree with you on this one ... At least we'll soon all be >> using 64 bit computers where OCaml doesn't suffer this limitation. On Feb 4, 2005, at 11:58, Oliver Bandel wrote: > Well, but even on those computers will be restrictions in the size. On 64-bit computers, the maximum string length is 2^56-9 bytes. > And I'm sure that with more powerful computers, there will be > more ressource-needing applications/calculations/computations > and so maybe there will be another problem then (maybe it needs > some decades to reach that limit?). If Moore's law holds until then, and starting from a gigabyte now, it will take about 40 years before you get a machine powerful enough to run into that limit. And the transistors of that machine will be smaller than protons. I hope we'll get 128-bit machines before then. -- Damien