On Feb 6, 2005, at 15:05, julius wrote:

> Actually, this is just un exemple that illustrates the real function I 
> used. We can add some use of the test pointer and result value but it 
> changes nothing: in this function you can't do anything that someway 
> malloc the test pointer.
> As you say it's very weird and much disapointing :)

Except for the "CAML" macro that doesn't exist and the uninitialized 
value
of the "result" variable, your code is correct.  The bug must be within
the part that you removed.

-- Damien