Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Estimating the size of the ocaml community
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Thomas Fischbacher <Thomas.Fischbacher@P...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] The boon of static type checking

On Sun, 13 Feb 2005, Tony Edgin wrote:

> On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:12, Thomas Fischbacher wrote:
> > On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, Michael Walter wrote:
> > > What I'm saying is that choosing a language is a tradeoff, and the
> > > kind of tradeoff C++ gives you can be a very good one (if not the
> > > best) for particular problem domains.
> >
> > Which would be for example?
> 
> An obvious example is code reuse.  For certain application domains, like for 
> instance, military simulation, many libraries of C++ code have been written.  
> Thus, for military simulation, C++ would be a good choice for reducing time 
> to market.

Could you give a specific example, but *please* one that is not related to 
killing people?

-- 
regards,               tf@cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de              (o_
 Thomas Fischbacher -  http://www.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~tf  //\
(lambda (n) ((lambda (p q r) (p p q r)) (lambda (g x y)           V_/_
(if (= x 0) y (g g (- x 1) (* x y)))) n 1))                  (Debian GNU)