Browse thread
[Benchmark] NBody
-
Christophe TROESTLER
-
Will M. Farr
- Christophe TROESTLER
- Martin Jambon
- skaller
- Xavier Leroy
-
Will M. Farr
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Christophe TROESTLER <Christophe.Troestler@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] [Benchmark] NBody |
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, "Will M. Farr" <farr@MIT.EDU> wrote:
>
> You might try profiling (using gprof); maybe it will give you an
> idea where your time is being spent.
I did that but I could not see anything: the important spot reads:
-----------------------------------------------
8.05 0.00 1000000/1000000 camlNbody__entry [5]
[6] 99.7 8.05 0.00 1000000 camlNbody__code_begin [6]
-----------------------------------------------
Did I miss something???
> it looks like the java code is faster, but it clearly has a large
> startup time.
I thought that. Still, I'd like to know whether there is a way to
make Caml code that fast or if not why.
Thanks for youe reply,
ChriS