Browse thread
[Benchmark] NBody
-
Christophe TROESTLER
-
Will M. Farr
- Christophe TROESTLER
- Martin Jambon
- skaller
- Xavier Leroy
-
Will M. Farr
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2005-02-07 (19:37) |
From: | Christophe TROESTLER <Christophe.Troestler@u...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] [Benchmark] NBody |
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, "Will M. Farr" <farr@MIT.EDU> wrote: > > You might try profiling (using gprof); maybe it will give you an > idea where your time is being spent. I did that but I could not see anything: the important spot reads: ----------------------------------------------- 8.05 0.00 1000000/1000000 camlNbody__entry [5] [6] 99.7 8.05 0.00 1000000 camlNbody__code_begin [6] ----------------------------------------------- Did I miss something??? > it looks like the java code is faster, but it clearly has a large > startup time. I thought that. Still, I'd like to know whether there is a way to make Caml code that fast or if not why. Thanks for youe reply, ChriS