Browse thread
[Benchmark] NBody
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | sejourne_kevin <sejourne_kevin@y...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] [Benchmark] NBody |
Martin Jambon a écrit : > On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Christophe TROESTLER wrote: > > >>Hi, >> >>For fun I have implemented an nbody simulation following >>http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/benchmark.php?test=nbody&lang=all&sort=cpu >>(code is attached). I've compiled it with >> >> ocamlopt -o nbody.com -inline 3 -unsafe -ccopt -O2 nbody.ml > > > -inline 100 gives better results for me (around -25%) > This should be enough to beat Java :-p if you get the same improvement on > your side. Same for me, but "-ccopt -O2" don't change anything. Kévin.