English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
Estimating the size of the ocaml community
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2005-02-07 (17:59)
From: skaller <skaller@u...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] The boon of static type checking
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 03:58, skaller wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 21:57, Ville-Pertti Keinonen wrote: 
> > 
> > While the single-assignment aspect of SSA could be considered
> > "functional", representing control flow using blocks and branches can't.
> Yeah it can, it has been proven SSA is equivalent to
> a purely functional representation. Branches are done with CPS.
> Sorry I can't find the paper: the paper was actually written
> to explain *why* SSA is easy to analyse.

Actually, here is the paper:


John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net
voice: 061-2-9660-0850, 
snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia
Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net