[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2005-02-14 (17:17) |
From: | Damien Doligez <damien.doligez@i...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Warning options |
On Feb 11, 2005, at 01:48, skaller wrote: > Ocaml appears to be following the same path as gcc with > respect to warnings: if a warning option isn't recognized > it is reported as a hard error. > > This feature creates an unnecessary upwards compatibility > barrier, and I request the INRIA team consider fixing it. > The correct strategy is to generate a warning, but > continue compiling anyhow. You're right, I will remove the check and silently ignore the bad warning flags. > (d) I put -w y to disable the warning In the meantime, you can use "-w aCDFMPSUVX" to disable the Y warning in a compatible way. Not very elegant, but it should work. > or provide a new warning like -w W w which disables/enables > the warning about bad warning flags depending on the > default (kind of complex ..) I don't think we want to go that far. -- Damien