[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2005-02-16 (19:35) |
From: | Frédéric_Gava <gava@u...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] interprocess mutex |
Hi, you could also used threads. It is easier. http://caml.inria.fr/ocaml/htmlman/manual038.html After you could used "Mutex", "Condition" and "Event" to synchronise your threads... To synnchronise true "process", you could used "waitpid". Regards, Frédéric Gava > Hello, > > I need to sequentialize two processes accessing the same GDBM database > (OCaml's dbm library). Since GDBM allows for only one writer at a time, > I need a way to block until the previous writer has finished. I think > there is a way to do this with the original GDBM library since it claims > to handle the file lockings properly -- I could block based on the > returned error codes. However, this functionality does not appear to be > exposed through the Dbm module. > > Of course I can implement this blocking myself with an interprocess > mutex. But how can I implement such a mutex in OCaml? I couldn't find > anything from the standard library that would resemble my problem. > > Is it easily doable or do I need to go and start hacking C code? I've > never done it on Unix but I know it's easily done on Windows. > > Thanks in advance, > Janne > > P.S. I'm using GDBM merely as a cache between process invocations, so > using a more heavyweight DB is out of the question. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs >