English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
Estimating the size of the ocaml community
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2005-02-13 (01:52)
From: Tony Edgin <edgin@s...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] The boon of static type checking
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:12, Thomas Fischbacher wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, Michael Walter wrote:
> > What I'm saying is that choosing a language is a tradeoff, and the
> > kind of tradeoff C++ gives you can be a very good one (if not the
> > best) for particular problem domains.
> Which would be for example?

An obvious example is code reuse.  For certain application domains, like for 
instance, military simulation, many libraries of C++ code have been written.  
Thus, for military simulation, C++ would be a good choice for reducing time 
to market.