Browse thread
Memory allocation nano-benchmark.
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2005-02-10 (15:19) |
From: | skaller <skaller@u...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Memory allocation nano-benchmark. |
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 01:47, Frédéric Gava wrote: > Hi, > > I think it is due to tablesize^3 applications of functions that are not > present in the C code. [skaller@pelican] ~>time ./a.out 250 real 0m3.303s user 0m2.850s sys 0m0.350s Using: let test tablesize = let table = Array.init tablesize (fun i -> Array.init tablesize (fun j -> Array.create tablesize 0)) in for i = 0 to tablesize - 1 do for j = 0 to tablesize - 1 do for k = 0 to tablesize - 1 do table.(i).(j).(k) <- (i+1)*(j+1)*(k+1) done done done ;; let _ = test (int_of_string Sys.argv.(1)) [skaller@pelican] ~>time ./xmem 250 real 0m3.327s user 0m2.760s sys 0m0.300s [skaller@pelican] ~>time ./cmem 250 real 0m0.706s user 0m0.150s sys 0m0.450s [I can't run it with >250 without the disk going nuts] -- John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net voice: 061-2-9660-0850, snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net