Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
32- and 64-bit performance
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Jon Harrop <jon@f...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] 32- and 64-bit performance
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 10:01, Ville-Pertti Keinonen wrote:
> Back when I got my first amd64 machine...


> Note that it isn't memory allocation and deallocation that is slower (on
> amd64, memory allocation is probably faster, since the allocation
> pointer is kept in a register), but programs that use fairly large
> amounts of memory.  32-bit vs. 64-bit might be the difference between
> everything fitting in L2 or not...

Yes. I was thinking that the GC would be slower due to worse cache use in 
64-bit. I used the phrase "de/allocation" as I was applying it to both C++ 
and OCaml.

This raises the question of exactly which OCaml types incur 64-bit quantities 
in the run-time. My guess:

  int (d'oh)
  constant (polymorphic) variant constructor?
  non-constant (polymorphic) variant constructor
  records (except those with all-float fields)

But isn't there quite a low limit on the number of constant variant type 
constructors allowed? So maybe they're squeezed into something a little 

Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
Objective CAML for Scientists