Browse thread
32- and 64-bit performance
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Alexander S. Usov <A.S.Usov@K...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] 32- and 64-bit performance |
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 09:46, Alex Baretta wrote: > Jon Harrop wrote: > > So ocamlopt does seem to generate significantly better code in these > > examples, particularly when they are floating point intensive. Also, only > > one test is slower in 64-bit, due to its heavy use of trees. > > Why do you suppose is there *any* benchmark faster in 32 bit mode than > in 64 bit mode on the Athlon64? Since the AMD64 architecture is > generally better than IA32--were it only for the additional registers--I > would expect all benchmarks to run as fast or faster when compiled to > the AMD64 instruction set. A one of the simplest reasons -- somewhat increased memory use. And memory access is incredibly expensive novadays. -- Best regards, Alexander.