Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
OCaml troll on Slashdot
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Christian Szegedy <szegedy@t...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml troll on Slashdot
brogoff wrote:

>I just ran your counterexample and the tail recursive code was faster
>for each. I used native code compilation.
>Byte code compilation gives similar results to yours, except that as I ran the
>test on "ye olde SPARC machine", it took a hell of a lot longer.
As far as I know, the bytecode compiler does not eliminate
tail calls.