Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
OCaml troll on Slashdot
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Yoann Padioleau <padiolea@i...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml troll on Slashdot
"William D.Neumann" <> writes:

> On Mar 15, 2005, at 2:03 PM, wrote:
> > where ?
> > Yes but this ocaml code use array ?
> Lists and arrays.  Each where it's appropriate.

I agree.

> > In that case it supports what the "troll" said, that is
> > the resulting code is no more "functionnal".
> To which, I'd assume the majority response would be, "So?"  

So some of his arguments are right. You make object "So?" but 
we could continue a long moment that way.

> And to
> which I might add Benjamin Pierce's comment, "Most arguments about
> 'What is the essence of...?' do more to reveal the prejudices of the
> participants than to uncover any objective truth about the topic of
> discussion.  Attempts to define the term 'object-oriented' are no
> exception."  Sure, he wrote it in regards to object oriented
> programming, but it fits functional programming very well 

Well not trying to define stuff is better ? 

> (a  polymorphic comment, indeed).


> >  He is not a newbie, this garden optimization problem is not that
> > simple.
> Well, a five minute glance at the code seems to indicate a very
> shallow understanding of OCaml.  He might be a wizard in other aspects
> of programming/CS, but dollars to donuts 

"dollars to donuts" ? 
I am an american newbie so I have no idea of what it means :)

> he's very much an OCaml newbie.

He is far better than most of my students.
It all depends on what you call a newbie.
We are all the newbie of someone else (except perhaps xavier leroy, eijiro sumii and company).

> > Perhaps the python/perl/ruby community are successful because they
> > answer to those "trolls" who often then become the first
> > advocater of the langage who in turn answer to other "trolls" which
> > make the community bigger and bigger.
> I dunno.  A couple of days ago there was a /. story about the new
> Randal Schwartz book, and at least one person was complaining about
> the perl newsgroups/mailing lists being full of unfriendly, unhelpful
> folk.

yes but there is also full of friendly helpful folks.

> William D. Neumann
> "You've got Rita Marlowe in the palm of your hand."
> "Palm of my hand?  You haven't seen Rita Marlowe..."
> 		-- Will Success Spoil Rock Hunter?
> _______________________________________________
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
> Archives:
> Beginner's list:
> Bug reports:

Yoann  Padioleau,  INSA de Rennes, France
Opinions expressed here are only mine. Je n'écris qu'à titre personnel.
**____   Get Free. Be Smart.  Simply use Linux and Free Software.   ____**