On Tuesday 15 March 2005 08:45, Michael Vanier wrote:
> Maybe he hasn't discovered ocamlopt yet.

No, the OCaml code (compiled with ocamlopt) is much, much slower than the C++. 
As we all know, this can mean only one thing...

Also, his C++ is actually shorter than the OCaml, and the OCaml defines a lot 
of familiar looking functions (map, length, "prepend" etc.).

I'll take a more detailed look in a minute...

-- 
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
Objective CAML for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists