Browse thread
Maximum non-constant constructors
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Richard Jones <rich@a...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Maximum non-constant constructors |
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 06:32:06PM +0100, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote: > Beware of the birthday paradox: the probability of finding two values > with the same hash is much larger than the probability of finding a > single value with the given hash (a square root of the previous one). Yes, I was thinking about this too: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OCaml#Code_examples (Good excuse to get rid of the terrible "99 bottles of beer" example too). Rich. -- Richard Jones, CTO Merjis Ltd. Merjis - web marketing and technology - http://merjis.com Team Notepad - intranets and extranets for business - http://team-notepad.com