Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
CamlGI question
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2005-04-21 (07:37)
From: Florian Hars <hars@b...>
Subject: Re: [Ocamlnet-devel] Re: [Caml-list] Re: Common CGI interface
Gerd Stolpmann wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 20.04.2005, 22:00 +0200 schrieb Christophe TROESTLER:
>>Also, why not distinguish simple parameters (for which a method that returns a
>>string is sufficient) and file uploads (for which one clearly wants
>>more flexibility).
> Because this is bullshit.

Oh, by the way, ocamlnet does not work with form data sent by Acrobat Reader, 
which POSTs its application/vnd.fdf responses an then runs into
                  | _ ->
                       failwith "Netcgi.std_activation: unknown Content-type";

Xforms 1.0 allows multipart/related and application/xml, WHATWG Web Forms 2.0 
specify application/x-www-form+xml, text/plain, as well as any legal MIME type 
as possible in POSTs, too. So something should be done here.

Yours, Florian Hars.