Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Syntactic inclusion of in ?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2005-04-10 (16:54)
From: Richard Jones <rich@a...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Syntactic inclusion of in ?
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 10:51:47AM -0700, Robert Roessler wrote:
> When I look at OCaml source code, however, I see a *lot* of really 
> different free-form coding styles.  The only language element that 
> jumps out at me for folding is a simplistic handling of "let" 
> bindings... which might not be useful for anything more than to say 
> "Now with folding!" :)

I tend to write *giant* functions, with multiple levels of nesting, so
that (nested) functions appear as close as possible to their point of
application.  Not sure whether folding helps here ...


Richard Jones, CTO Merjis Ltd.
Merjis - web marketing and technology -
Team Notepad - intranets and extranets for business -