Browse thread
Camlp4: extending syntax of record definitions
-
Markus Mottl
-
Martin Jambon
-
Stefano Zacchiroli
- Markus Mottl
- Markus Mottl
-
Stefano Zacchiroli
-
Martin Jambon
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Markus Mottl <markus.mottl@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] too few public grammar entry points |
On 4/19/05, Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@bononia.it> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 01:19:43PM -0700, Martin Jambon wrote: > > If the entry that contains this rule is public, then you can delete the > > rule and rewrite it, and everything is fine. > > Otherwise, you have to improvise. Which is the case here: the type_kind > > entry is not visible from outside. > > I think this is a major problem with current campl4 situation. In my > experience one starts extending an entry point of the ocaml grammar, > then discover that he needs to extend something else, but unfortunately > that "something else" is not public. > > Why there are so few grammar entry points made public? > > I think camlp4-ers life woule be a lot easier if more of them are made > public. I second this suggestion: please add more public entry points to the grammar. Regards, Markus -- Markus Mottl http://www.ocaml.info markus.mottl@gmail.com