On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 01:03:42PM -0800, Robert Roessler wrote:
> Indeed, all of your posts to *that thread* are "redacted"... but 
> magically, people responding to you were able to quote you. :)
> 
> Not knowing how the automated machinery of the Caml list actually 
> functions, I could hazard a guess - were your posts to the thread in 
> question perhaps formatted as something other than plain text and/or 
> for some other reason appeared as attachments?

This is sort of what I thought.  I also thought that perhaps my posts
contains an [X-]No-Archive header.  Although I don't have the original
messages --- they are sitting on the hard drive of a computer with a
zapped motherboard at the moment --- I'm fairly certain that neither
is the case.  I use mutt, and I don't add any fancy headers.

> If there actually was a conspiracy involved here, it was somewhat 
> localized - random checks of other "richard jones" threads seem to all 
> be present and accounted for. :)

Well, odd :-)

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, CTO Merjis Ltd.
Merjis - web marketing and technology - http://merjis.com
Team Notepad - intranets and extranets for business - http://team-notepad.com