Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Syntactic inclusion of in ?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2005-04-09 (21:27)
From: William D.Neumann <wneumann@c...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Syntactic inclusion of in ?
On Apr 9, 2005, at 11:51 AM, Robert Roessler wrote:

> When I look at OCaml source code, however, I see a *lot* of really 
> different free-form coding styles.  The only language element that 
> jumps out at me for folding is a simplistic handling of "let" 
> bindings... which might not be useful for anything more than to say 
> "Now with folding!" :)

The folding portion of the OCaml TextMate[1] module I put together also 
allows folding for modules and their signatures (between sig/struct and 
end) and classes (between object and end), and possibly some other 
places that I've forgotten (perhaps begin/end pairs?).

[1] <>

William D. Neumann

"You've got Rita Marlowe in the palm of your hand."
"Palm of my hand?  You haven't seen Rita Marlowe..."

		-- Will Success Spoil Rock Hunter?