Browse thread
Syntactic inclusion of a.ml in b.ml ?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | William D.Neumann <wneumann@c...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Syntactic inclusion of a.ml in b.ml ? |
On Apr 9, 2005, at 11:51 AM, Robert Roessler wrote: > When I look at OCaml source code, however, I see a *lot* of really > different free-form coding styles. The only language element that > jumps out at me for folding is a simplistic handling of "let" > bindings... which might not be useful for anything more than to say > "Now with folding!" :) The folding portion of the OCaml TextMate[1] module I put together also allows folding for modules and their signatures (between sig/struct and end) and classes (between object and end), and possibly some other places that I've forgotten (perhaps begin/end pairs?). [1] <http://www.macromates.com/> William D. Neumann "You've got Rita Marlowe in the palm of your hand." "Palm of my hand? You haven't seen Rita Marlowe..." -- Will Success Spoil Rock Hunter?