Browse thread
CamlGI question
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jean-Christophe Filliatre <Jean-Christophe.Filliatre@l...> |
| Subject: | Re: Common CGI interface (was: [Caml-list] CamlGI question) |
Gerd Stolpmann writes: > > I am quite astonished at seeing that many CGI implementations. I only > knew the implementation of de Rauglaudre and Filliatre, and its > limitations were one the motivations to develop Ocamlnet. Just to clarify the situation (if needed): I wrote my CGI library for my own purposes and it is not intended to be complete, RFC-compliant, or whatever. Even if it appears in the hump (by the time I put it online there were not so many such libraries), it does not make much sense to compare it today with libraries such as ocamlnet. -- Jean-Christophe Filliātre (http://www.lri.fr/~filliatr)