Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
More on SOAP
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Richard Jones <rich@a...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] More on SOAP
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 10:47:50AM +0200, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen wrote:
>  Dear Richard,
> > Instead of parsing WSDL, what I'm doing is allowing you to define the
> > interface as a familiar .mli file, as in the example below:
>  what do you do with higher order functions?

It would refuse to parse the type if it noticed that a function was
passed to or returned from a SOAP stub.  I wasn't even aware that you
could pass higher-order functions to SOAP functions - in fact, I don't
even know how that would work with the majority of languages used to
implement SOAP servers (ie. Java and C#) which don't support functions
as first class objects.


Richard Jones, CTO Merjis Ltd.
Merjis - web marketing and technology -
Team Notepad - intranets and extranets for business -