Browse thread
More on SOAP
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2005-05-16 (09:11) |
From: | Richard Jones <rich@a...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] More on SOAP |
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 10:47:50AM +0200, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen wrote: > Dear Richard, > > > Instead of parsing WSDL, what I'm doing is allowing you to define the > > interface as a familiar .mli file, as in the example below: > > what do you do with higher order functions? It would refuse to parse the type if it noticed that a function was passed to or returned from a SOAP stub. I wasn't even aware that you could pass higher-order functions to SOAP functions - in fact, I don't even know how that would work with the majority of languages used to implement SOAP servers (ie. Java and C#) which don't support functions as first class objects. Rich. -- Richard Jones, CTO Merjis Ltd. Merjis - web marketing and technology - http://merjis.com Team Notepad - intranets and extranets for business - http://team-notepad.com