Browse thread
A nastier example
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jon Harrop <jon@f...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] A nastier example |
On Sunday 15 May 2005 18:24, Mark Shinwell wrote: > On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 08:09:28PM +0100, Jon Harrop wrote: > > Does code ever work differently in the top-level than when compiled (with > > ocamlc)? > > Yes. See for example "Reply 2" of: > > http://pauillac.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs/not%20a%20bug?id=3591;page=64;user=g >uest Very interesting. In summary, is it fair to say that Marshall has problems with functions when used in the top-level but not with ocamlc- and ocamlopt- compiled code? Thanks for the link. -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. Objective CAML for Scientists http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists