English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
A nastier example
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2005-05-16 (00:15)
From: Jon Harrop <jon@f...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] A nastier example
On Sunday 15 May 2005 18:24, Mark Shinwell wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 08:09:28PM +0100, Jon Harrop wrote:
> > Does code ever work differently in the top-level than when compiled (with
> > ocamlc)?
>
> Yes.  See for example "Reply 2" of:
>
> http://pauillac.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs/not%20a%20bug?id=3591;page=64;user=g
>uest

Very interesting. In summary, is it fair to say that Marshall has problems 
with functions when used in the top-level but not with ocamlc- and ocamlopt- 
compiled code?

Thanks for the link.

-- 
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
Objective CAML for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists