[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2005-06-09 (15:27) |
From: | John Skaller <skaller@u...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Caml on intel-OSX |
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 07:00 -0700, james woodyatt wrote: > On 08 Jun 2005, at 22:33, John Skaller wrote: > > > > And a dumb question .. will a bytecode Ocaml program > > just run on any machine provided a single binary, > > ocamlrun, is installed and accessible? > > You probably want all the ocaml tools to be built as universal binaries > and you probably also want the ocamlopt compiler to be able to produce > universal binaries. I would expect that will require some effort from > the Caml Team at INRIA. Lol! no, it is a simple question. Can I make a bytecode program and just ship it an expect it to run? No. So what else is required? > Even inside Apple, most of the > software engineers don't have Intel development machines. My friend is in San Francisco right now and does. It was he that asked "Why not have a bytecode version of the Felix compiler, so we don't have to install Ocaml on every platform?" -- John Skaller, skaller at users.sf.net PO Box 401 Glebe, NSW 2037, Australia Ph:61-2-96600850 Download Felix here: http://felix.sf.net