[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2005-06-09 (16:20) |
From: | padiolea@i... |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Caml on intel-OSX |
> On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 07:00 -0700, james woodyatt wrote: >> On 08 Jun 2005, at 22:33, John Skaller wrote: >> > >> > And a dumb question .. will a bytecode Ocaml program >> > just run on any machine provided a single binary, >> > ocamlrun, is installed and accessible? >> >> You probably want all the ocaml tools to be built as universal binaries >> and you probably also want the ocamlopt compiler to be able to produce >> universal binaries. I would expect that will require some effort from >> the Caml Team at INRIA. > > Lol! no, it is a simple question. Can I make a bytecode program > and just ship it an expect it to run? No. So what else is required? I guess that if your bytecode program require some external libraries, such as for instance if you do a "open Dbm" then you must have too this library. I think that ocamlrun only include code to handle the Pervasive library.