[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2005-06-26 (12:19) |
From: | Oliver Bandel <oliver@f...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Stream parser/make_lexer |
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 12:12:40PM +0200, Sen Horak wrote: [...] > Also, is the make_lexer/stream parser way of building a parser > deprecated? I find it a convenient way to build small parsers quickly. > Or do most ocaml programmers just use ocamllex/ocamlyacc for > everything? I sometimes used the Stream-Module. But in the last time I switched more to ocamllex/ocamlyacc. The reason is, that I find them a good tool for many things. But I didn't tried the camlp4-stuff. It may be more easy to write complicated parsers with thema and maybe more elegant. But one reason to use ocamllex/ocamlyacc is that they are similar to lex/yacc, and therfore, if programming in a commercial field, porting the Ocaml-software back to C (even if not really happy about this), is easier. So during the next days and weeks I think I will develop some software twice: in C and the same program also in OCaml. This will yield insights to how much easier and safer it is to develop in OCaml than in C. I just yesterday got a "Bus error" because one function was not/bad implemented in the C version. I didn't ported that stuff to OCaml now, but it is planned. And OCaml had warned me that there is a problem. (But, btw: using -Wall from gcc would have warned me, but OCaml wouldn't compile the code...) So, using ocamllex/ocymlyacc has some advantages that are not in the programming field itself... but in the working environment / where you want to use your software. It's really hard to start with OCaml and then restrictions say that you have to use C instead... but that's how it is. Ciao, Oliver