Browse thread
How INRIA people envision OCaml's parallel future?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Erik de Castro Lopo <ocaml-erikd@m...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] How INRIA people envision OCaml's parallel future? |
Eric Stokes wrote:
> Don't worry about it, it really is a valid issue that needs to be
> evaluated again every so often. Its true that many people have
> noticed the new multi core trend. However it has to be asked whether
> threads are really the right answer. They can honestly become a
> nightmare quite quickly.
The problem with threads is that they were never meant as a solution
to the multi-processing problem. See here:
http://sardes.inrialpes.fr/~aschmitt/cwn/2002.11.26.html#8
For multiprocessing you need to look at something like shared
memory of commumication over pipes or sockets.
Erik
--
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
Erik de Castro Lopo nospam@mega-nerd.com (Yes it's valid)
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
C++ is a siren song. It *looks* like a HLL in which you ought
to be able to write an application, but it really isn't."
-- Alain Picard (comp.lang.lisp)