Browse thread
How INRIA people envision OCaml's parallel future?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2005-06-24 (12:50) |
From: | David MENTRE <david.mentre@g...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] How INRIA people envision OCaml's parallel future? |
[ Last email, I swear it! ;-) ] Hello, 2005/6/24, David MENTRE <david.mentre@gmail.com>: > Anyway, INRIA people have already worked on those issues and had > proposals. It is just that they feel it was not worth the trouble, *at > that time*: > http://groups.google.com/groups?q=doligez+parallel+GC+caml-list&hl=fr&lr=&selm=fa.dlqoshv.1a66ho7%40ifi.uio.no&rnum=2 >From private and public emails, it appears that I have fed an old troll. My intent is not to start another thread about GC and threading. My intent is to know how, in a short future, I could efficiently use a moderately SMP machine by writing pure OCaml code. It could be with typed channels between unix processes, by modifying the GC, by using concurrent constructs within the language, ... I don't know so this is why I'm asking it here. Yours, d.