Browse thread
AW: [Caml-list] Unix.waitpid
- Bauer, Christoph
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2005-06-30 (13:11) |
From: | Bauer, Christoph <Christoph.Bauer@l...> |
Subject: | AW: [Caml-list] Unix.waitpid |
Hi, > > > Well, using the corresponding C-API-function, > you should better rename your arguments: > > wpid is the pid you wait for (the argument to Unix.waitpid) and > pid is the value you get from that function: > > > ===== from the wait(2)/waitpid(2)-manpage ============= > pid_t > waitpid(pid_t wpid, int *status, int options); > ======================================================= > Ok. > > BTW: where do you set the "pid" initially? > >From a Unix.create_process call. > And: if waitpid returns with a pid, then you can't wait on this > pid/process again. So, if you wait for one pid and get a different > pid as result of the function call, then you wait again. > But if you another time waits for a pid, which you alread caught > (got as a result once before), then you can wait infinite, > because that pid was caught by waitpud before... and you have to > wait until the pid is reused by the kernel or wait until next > reboot. ;-) Ok, then I'll use pid = 0 (or wpid = 0, after the renaming) to terminate the loop. Thanks for the replies, Christoph Bauer