Browse thread
Type abstraction and (polymorphic) equality
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Andreas Rossberg <rossberg@p...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Type abstraction and (polymorphic) equality |
Jon Harrop wrote: > > I do not believe so. IIRC, SML has equality types to help with this problem. Equality types only provide half a solution (preventing accidental (ab)use of polymorphic equality). Solving the whole problem (enabling user-defined equality on user-defined types) requires something more general, e.g. type classes. - Andreas -- Andreas Rossberg, rossberg@ps.uni-sb.de Let's get rid of those possible thingies! -- TB