Browse thread
(Mostly) Functional Design?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2005-07-24 (16:11) |
From: | David MENTRE <dmentre@l...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Some Clarifications |
Robert Morelli <morelli@cs.utah.edu> writes: > Several years ago I read a paper about a computer algebra system > written in OCaml called FOC. The title of the paper was something > like "Functors, blah, blah, ... Is it Too Much?" I think the > conclusion of the paper was that FOC naturally drew upon all of OCaml's > language facilities, both functional and object oriented. This paper > might speak to the demands of the domain for anyone who is curious > enough to look it up. Of course, we can equally well ask, "Is it > Enough?" http://www.lip6.fr/fr/production/publications-rapport-fiche.php?RECORD_KEY%28rapports%29=id&id(rapports)=139 Yours, d. -- pub 1024D/A3AD7A2A 2004-10-03 David MENTRE <dmentre@linux-france.org> 5996 CC46 4612 9CA4 3562 D7AC 6C67 9E96 A3AD 7A2A