I just noticed this when my OCaml syntax-colorer failed to render lnot 
as a keyword... :)

So I checked the manual section (6.1 "Lexical conventions", subsection 
"Keywords") that served as the reference for said syntax-colorer and 
noticed that lnot is not there.

Since the other "bitwise" logical operators are listed as keywords, I 
assume this is an oversight?

Robert Roessler
roessler@rftp.com
http://www.rftp.com