Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Request for caml-list mantainer
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Josh Myer <josh@j...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Request for caml-list mantainer
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 09:04:47AM +0200, Luca Pascali wrote:

> Now, is it possible to set the Reply To field into the e-main forwarded 
> by Caml-list to have an automatic follow-up to the list?

Doing this seems like a good idea, but it has many implications and
annoys lots of people.  It's been discussed here before (several times);
I'd link to them, but google isn't interacting nicely with the archives
at the moment.  So, I'll leave finding those messages as an exercise.

A quick read on the issue is "'Reply-To' Munging Considered Harmful,"
available at:

If I recall correctly, finding the archived discussions will yield a
nice piece of ASCII-art as a consolation prize =)
/jbm, but you can call me Josh. Really, you can.

 "Was sich ueberhaupt sagen laesst, laesst sich 
  klar sagen; und wovon man nicht reden kann, 
  darueber muss man schweigen."
   -- Wittgenstein, in Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus