Browse thread
Request for caml-list mantainer
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Josh Myer <josh@j...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Request for caml-list mantainer |
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 09:04:47AM +0200, Luca Pascali wrote: > Now, is it possible to set the Reply To field into the e-main forwarded > by Caml-list to have an automatic follow-up to the list? > Doing this seems like a good idea, but it has many implications and annoys lots of people. It's been discussed here before (several times); I'd link to them, but google isn't interacting nicely with the archives at the moment. So, I'll leave finding those messages as an exercise. A quick read on the issue is "'Reply-To' Munging Considered Harmful," available at: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html If I recall correctly, finding the archived discussions will yield a nice piece of ASCII-art as a consolation prize =) -- /jbm, but you can call me Josh. Really, you can. "Was sich ueberhaupt sagen laesst, laesst sich klar sagen; und wovon man nicht reden kann, darueber muss man schweigen." -- Wittgenstein, in Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus