Browse thread
x86 vs AMD64 OCaml compiler performance
-
Jon Harrop
- Florian Hars
-
Robert Roessler
-
Jon Harrop
- Christopher Campbell
-
Jon Harrop
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Christopher Campbell <cyberdanx@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] x86 vs AMD64 OCaml compiler performance |
Jon Harrop wrote: > On Wednesday 06 July 2005 18:16, you wrote: > >>Jon Harrop wrote: >> >>>I just timed recompilation of my latest project to both byte code and >>>native code on both 900MHz Athlon t-bird and 800MHz Athlon64. To my >>>suprise, compilation to native code takes roughly the same amount of time >>>on both computers but compilation to byte code is slightly faster (1m18 >>>vs 1m40) on x86 but vastly faster (21s vs 1m50) on AMD64. >> >>Ummm... do you mean "1800MHz" or "1.8GHz" for the Athlon64? :) > > > No, I got that bit right - 800MHz (downclocked for the muggy summer). Running > at 1.8GHz it compiles in 9s but overheats and switches off after a few > minutes, especially when the GPU is working like a Trojan. You probably have, but I'll ask anyway. Have you checked the heatsink is seated properly and the case has suitable airflow? I have a Athlon64 3200 (Winchester) with a 6600GT in a room with a combi boiler in the cupboard and it's always bloomin' hot in here but the system never crashes and dies. Mind you, it has a smaller cache and I don't live in Cambridge (unfortunately I live in damp dreach Glasgow).